After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures throughout Europe, new technologies are actually reviving these kinds of systems. By lie detection tools tested at the edge to a system for validating documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of solutions is being utilized for asylum applications. This article explores how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. That reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unstable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs the capacity to work these devices and to go after their right for protection.
It also displays how these technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They help the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering these people from opening the programs of safeguards. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight into the disciplinary www.ascella-llc.com/generated-post-2 mechanisms of them technologies, in which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who have are regimented by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article argues that these technology have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double effect: although they aid to expedite the asylum procedure, they also make it difficult for the purpose of refugees to navigate these types of systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions created by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.